All the wisdom of the MGTOW thanks to Sandman (https://www.youtube.com/user/SandmanMGTOW)
Hi Sandman, I recall you mentioning that you work from home. Making a living from home interests me as well, as finding an enjoyable job is the last obstacle between me and going my own way. You see, I'm not very fond of the social aspect that is coupled with a traditional job. I don't want to be tied to one place, have to please my co-workers, or kiss my bosses' ass. Nor do I want to have to appear mediocre to avoid my colleagues getting envious. Ideally, I would just do my job and get a pay for it without needing to meet my co-workers in person, at least not regularly. Some background: I study computer science, and would like my job to be in that field. I could either work for a company or start my own. I have some, but not much, work experience, however I am quick to learn. In case you aren't an expert in this field, I would appreciate some ideas on where to look for a home-based job, how to avoid being taken advantage of, how much income per hour can I expect from this, and whatever else you think is relevant." Thanks for your questions Elias. The first thing you need to remember is that finding fun jobs that you enjoy doing and building a business out of them means you'll have to put in longer hours then you would working for a company. With most corporate jobs you have to wrestle office politics while simultaneously getting your work done. It's like you're doing two or more jobs at the same time. But if you have your own business you have to do everything yourself in most cases, find clients, bill them and do the accounting as well as do the actual work. It's tough being an entrepreneur and most work for ten dollars an hour for ten or more hours per day. The only benefit to working such long hours is that you can accomplish so much more and work longer because you don't have a monkey on your back or boss whipping you to work ever more harder and faster. I hate to say this to you Elias but working from home is difficult and stressful but in a completely different way. But the benefits are no boss and you can usually get things done when you want to get them done. You also have to set aside money to pay your taxes. You don't want to end up like Wesley Snipes and get sent to prison for tax evasion. From my experience the best and most consistent business is an online business with online advertising. All you have to do is bring a consistent stream of eyeballs to see your website or YouTube channel and you can make a living doing that. Lui Marco makes well into the six figures with his main YouTube channel talking about natural bodybuilding.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
"Hi Sandman, Please do a video another video on suicide. I am 27 years old and I have been MGTOW for most of my life. I also love fitness. I cycle around 200 miles a week. And I accomplished most of the career goals I wanted to by the age of twenty three. I worked in DC in US federal politics. I got screwed over and lost my job and had to live with my mother. I just finished my MBA and I teach at a local college. I see now that the world doesn't care about my existence. Therefore, I want to have as much fun as possible while destroying the system. I want to die via hypoxia at 35. I want to use government programs before I do it. This will increase the US debt and help destroy the government. What do you think? What do you think about living like an Ubermensch and then offing yourself when the debt etc comes to roast? Thanks." Well Jared I'd thank you for your questions but they've left me a little bit disturbed. I think you're troubled with regards to wanting to end your life. I feel you should seek out some form of counselling if you're going to off yourself in seven years. You sound rational and sane but you still need counselling. And if no one can talk you out of suicide and you're planning to end your own life regardless attacking the government by racking up debts is not the way to do it. The government has the printing press so any money that you borrow can easily be inflated away. If you really wanted to destroy actual money then I'd suggest buying a bunch of gold and dropping it into the deep blue ocean. But even then the value of the remaining gold above ground would just go up in value and cancel out any destruction of the money you lost in the Ocean. I think you are bitter about losing your job. I think that you want to do whatever you can to take down the government because you lost your government job.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
I was going to make this video a while ago but I've had a lot of donation based videos and topics to cover. In fact I'm dedicating this video to Omar and a donation he made. By now most of you have heard of the antics of Matt Taylor wearing his bowling shirt with images of scantily clad women on it when he wore it shortly after the the Rosetta spacecraft landed on a comet. But what no one wants to talk about is that shirtgate is really a giant sized shit test. A shit test on the scale of the entirety of western civilization. And Matt Taylor failed the shit test when he went on television and broke down crying. As far as I'm concerned he should have gone on national television with Elly Prizeman, his female friend that sewed the shirt for him and shown everyone that he wasn't a casual misogynist but he was wearing the shirt for her. I heard somewhere that she is also feminist. So he could have used the situation to his advantage but instead he failed the public shit he was exposed to. He could have gone one step further by bringing Elly Prizeman and two or three of her friends on television with him. He should played up to this story like Bob Barker back when he was hosting the Price is Right television show. If you remember Bob Barker has his own casual brand of patriarchy on the show and went as far as to objectify the women on the show by calling them Barker's beauties. Matt Taylor should have been broadcasting to the world that if men are going to be shit tested by feminists then they need to stand up to those same women. Bringing three or four beautiful women on television with him would have cemented him as an alpha male. He would have passedthe shit test and the women with him would have shown other women the social proof that he was the type of guy that women found attractive because he wasn't going to apologize for his actions. And how could a man be portrayed as sexist if he surrounded himself with women that were willingly there to support him. This would expose the hypocrisy of feminism. I don't know if the ESA or European Space Agency forced Matt him to go on television and apologize or if it was ultimately his own decision. I don't know if he could have spoken to a publicist before making his apology. Remember it's not just him that was being shit tested but the entire European Space Agency.GhomeshiGate - MGTOW (Jian Ghomeshi)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_KUt...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
"Hi Sandman, first of all thank you so much for all your videos. I have awoken from a beta blue pill slumber at 27 years old and I don't feel hate towards women but utter happiness because I have woken me up and freed my mind. I was a beta white knight my whole life. I would do everything I could to make the women in my life happy and it would never work. Mostly because they were narcissists. I did watch your video on generous men and female narcissism. I've learned so much from MGTOW but the best red pills have shown me my own faults, misunderstandings and how being raised by a single mother, contributed to how my life and troubles with women worked out, my current sexual needs are being met from one of my narcissistic ex girlfriends but purely as a business relationship. That way I can ignore women and focus on my new business but can still keep an outlet for my sex drive. My only worry with choosing to go MGTOW is that I will become narcissistic as well and that's the last thing I want to be. Also I would like to note that I am a veteran of the Marine Infantry, I've always lived an Alpha life style in the jobs I've done but with women I have always been a beta. Until now! Could you do a video on Narcissism as to where is the line drawn for meeting your own needs and not becoming a dick. This is coming from someone who's main source of happiness was doing things to make others to make himself happy. So I'm like a fish out of water. Thanks for saving my life bro!" Well thanks for your donation, whoever you are. As I'm sure everyone already knows altruism is the opposite of narcissism. And as far as I'm concerned we all have both qualities inside of us. Women just tend to be more narcissistic because their inflated ego comes from their looks and they are more attractive when they are younger so for them their narcissism is based on what nature has given them in many cases.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Today I'm going to review a book from Bobby Cenoura. He was kind enough to send me my own copy of his book called Male Angst Volume 1 : FML I Always Get "Those" Chicks in quotations. The FML stands for Fuck My Life for those of you that are acronym challenged. So Bobby wants me to do a book review. So here goes. This book is about guys named Reggie and his recounting of courtships with two short term disastrous girls in the past. The first half of the book describes the relationship dealings with a weed head Vietnamese woman, named Linh that owns a nail salon and has an obsessed husband. And the second one is with a Hispanic mother of two with two different baby daddies. The book is a form of personal therapy where the male character regurgitate their fears, objections and rejections onto the reader. I'm not sure why a fictional character needs therapy and I'll go out on a limb here and say that this is more therapy for the author Bobby Cenoura, although I could be wrong. I'm not sure if Bobby "the author" and Reggie "the main book characters" share the same characteristics. Maybe Bobby is telling Reggies story who is actually a friend or a group of friends. But it doesn't matter. This book is essentially the antithesis of fifty shades of grey. I looked on the Amazon dot com link for this book and it says that it's a fictional story based on contemporary male and African American tales. After reading the two stories found in this book I take them as a warning to any man going their own way that our first rule if and when we date is don't date single mothers. Ninety percent of the drama found in this book can be easily avoided by following that rule. But even still reading the drama was entertaining as this book is extremely descriptive. It gives you subtle details behind the characters, motivations and actually reads like a first hand account instead of simply fiction. Sometimes I had a hard time not believing that the main character doesn't actually exist. That's why I keep thinking that he has to be a real person or these have to be the experiences of the author that he's sharing. Anyways, the first half Linh the Vietnamese single mother of two children gets the plaque cleaned off her dirty teeth and her sexual marketplace value increases. And because of that Reggie, the main character says that when a woman gets a boob job and other upgrades for her body her value goes up because more guys then no want women that is custom built and not off the rack. Or a plain Jane. Reggie had great sex with her before the dental work but now would probably have to jump through additional hoops to get what he had before which I presume is the great sex?Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
"Hi Sandman A huge topic of interest, women in male dominated fields. Not sure if you have covered it. Just search "Royal Canadian Mounted Police sets 'ambitious' recruitment target: 50% women" Can you imagine that? In the military I saw one woman for every 50 guys...it was like seeing the inflated egos of online dating 3's and 4's in person. Cocks being thrown at them from all directions. But in the middle of winter when every sane man was wearing a sweater and heavy jacket, they would insist on parading around in a slightly-too-small T-shirt! Can you imagine a guy being in that type of environment, roles reversed? It's everywhere now, even in the trades. Big recruiting drives to get women into welding, electrical etc. WTF? why man? Thanks again, you are doing "gods" work. Opening more eyes means less suffering." Well thanks for your questions Mr. Annonymous. I had no idea that the Royal Canadian Mounted police were interested in making half their new recruits women starting next year. I'm including a link to an article in the description below that discusses what's going on. They outline that they want to have targets in place to raise their number of female officers from roughly twenty percent today to thirty percent by twenty twenty five. The article also mentions that there have been many sexaul harrassment issues with the RCMP or Royal Canadian Mounted Police. And with all of that sexual harrassment going on I'm sure that someone somewhere in that national police force is looking at whatever strategies it can to lower the money they have to pay out due to that harrassment. Girl Writes What mentioned before that once a workplace reaches a rough threshold or ratio of women working in it then male behavior just naturally changes and men start to behave differently due to the number of women in the environment.RCMP parity worthy goalhttp://www.thestarphoenix.com/news/RC...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
A couple of days ago Nualaboala sent me a link to an article that I'm adding in the description below. The article is called "Women take more sick days than men" and it's from the Telegraph in the UK. And here's the first paragraph from that article: "Research shows the average man takes a total of 140 days off sick during their career, while women phone in sick 189 times. Despite this, women are more likely to "try their hardest to make it to their desk" and "feel guilty" if they succumb to illness. Male employees, on the other hand, are more likely to be called up by their boss because of their poor track record. Stomach bugs, dizziness and viruses are the most common ailments which strike down the British workforce." So let me get this straight. In Britain male employees take less sick days then their female counterparts yet they are the ones written up and shamed for getting sick in the first place and then being irresponsible enough to not come to work. I didn't think to much about the article over the last few days until I was thinking for a new topic for a mgtow video. And I oddly remembered a video I saw many years ago about the man cold. I'm also adding a link to that video in the description below. I remember watching that video in a room full of about eighty percent women and twenty percent women. The video exaggerates the effects of a cold on a man. I'm sure that men and women feel the pain of getting a cold or the flu the same way. Yet men are shamed for it. We are expected to show up to work even if we can barely stand. Wives shame men for getting sick as well as employers. It's almost like we aren't allowed to feel pain. We are supposed to suck it up buttercup and go about our merry way. When I was younger I completely believed this bullshit about making it to school no matter what and even won the attendance award while I was in middle school.Women Take More Sick Days http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newst...Man Stroke Woman - Man Coldhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbmbM...Truth About Man Coldshttp://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/fea...Man flu is no myth as scientists prove men suffer more from diseasehttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/hea...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
"I am a 33 year-old male. At some point, ideally before I’m 40, I want to have a child conceived through egg donation and surrogacy. I want to know your opinion on something. Awhile ago, I discovered a website called anonymousus.org, which is run by Alana S. Newman, who was donor conceived, and is currently an activist against assisted reproductive technology (ART). The website is filled with anonymous personal stories from children who were conceived via egg donation or sperm donation. Most of these children seem to have issues over the manner in which they were conceived. While it is my dream to be a single father, when I read these stories from donor conceived children, I do experience some second thoughts on the subject. Here's my question for you Sandman: Are you concerned over issues your future child may experience over the way he was conceived? I know you plan to keep in touch with the egg donor so that your child knows who the mother is, and that is certainly better than keeping an anonymous relationship. My view on the subject is that assisted reproductive technology exists for socially infertile people (socially infertile referring to people who are unlikely to reproduce the regular way, such as gay couples, socially inept single people, or even single people by choice). And I’ve heard it argued that, “A mother and a father is preferable to one parent, and even though it’s not necessarily your fault that you’re socially infertile, your child shouldn’t have to suffer for it by not having a mother, so it is unethical for you to conceive a child using an egg donor. You are violating that child’s right to have two parents.” An argument I’ve heard in response is, “Well, if it’s unethical to conceive a child without a mother because children with two parents statistically do better than children with one parent, then let’s talk about the African-American population as an analogy. Statistically, black people don’t do as well as white people do. One out of every three black men will go to prison in their lifetime. Black people are also less likely to go to college. Black people have to deal with a lot of racism. Clearly, black people face a lot of challenges in life that white people generally don’t face, so it would arguably be preferential to be born as a white person instead of a black person. So by the same logic, wouldn’t it be unethical for black people to reproduce because they’re having children who aren’t white and therefore will face more challenges in life?” I believe everybody should be treated equally in regards to reproduction, whether they are socially infertile, black, white, gay, married, single, etc. The resulting child is no worse off by luck of the draw than any child born to less than optimal circumstances.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Hi Sandman, I was wondering if you could do a video on the effects of taking the Red Pill. I was hoping you could explain a little bit on the change a man goes through once taking the red pill. For me two big changes have come, one is compassion for my fellow man, and the second is letting go and holding NO attachments. recently I lost a gay friend I had because I spoke out about the gynocentric crap men deal with inn today's culture and I also lost my dads brother who had a sex change a few years ago and is not trying to go back to being a man because he was trying to convince me I was an angry little man whom hates women. I was unable to get through to him why I have NO reason to trust any women. He then shut down completely when I brought up how my mother DESTROYED him (my dad and his brother) when she divorced him back in 1994 through false accusations, child custody battles, destroying his credit before divorcing him, putting him thousands in debt, ect. was wondering if you would talk about this and explain further as well." Well thanks for your questions David. Well for most men the first effect of taking the red pill is going through red pill rage. And I don't want to rehash that topic so I'm adding a link to that particular video in the description below. As for the changes you've gone through David these are very typical social changes. You are standing up to your aunt a former blue pill men turned into a woman as well as a gay guy you were once friends with and they don't accept you. I'm going to step out on a limb here and say that neither of them accept you because they probably both have a gender identity that is more female then male. I don't know how feminine your former gay friend is but I'm guessing he's more feminine then typical male. Anyways, reaching the two of them is pointless. You're better to take that compassion for your fellow men and help those you can reach and not focus your effort on those you can't save. I hope that answers your question? But your other question about how taking the red pill effects men really got me thinking about something I would consider the Red Pill Renaissance.Red Pill Rage - MGTOWhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwXRi...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Why does the existence of men going their own way create an emotional crisis for many women? If we as men take the energy, resources and time that we normally spend on women in relationships and instead choose to divert that energy for our own desires and dreams, don't we have the right to self-determination? If we use our lives to accomplish things on our own or just chill out, why shouldn't we have that right, without some women throwing hissy fits directed at us attempting to shame us back into a relationship or marriage? I've spoken to less then a handful of women in real life and exposed my choice to become a MGTOW with them. I explained to them that I was against feminism and they were happy I was taking a stance against feminism. But when I explained to them that I was a MGTOW the majority of them got angry with me. I could feel the rage and frustration coming from them. And the ones that don't like it have been trying to talk me out of going my own way. Most women in our society have a personal identity that is tied directly to their value as sexual creatures. They value themselves based on men objectifying them. So if men reject the sexual identity of a woman then they are essentially telling them they have no value. And when you tell a woman about the existence of MGTOW you are indirectly attacking their self worth and ego. If you've ever rejected a woman in your own personal life or dumped her then you'll notice how other women also take it as a personal assault on their self worth when one of their friends is dumped or discarded. It's not so much that they hate us for escaping the plantation so much as the fact that we have rejected their female value system and the worship of the golden uterus. Worshiping the vagina is a value system that almost all the women in our society follow. I also believe women hate us MGTOWs because every dollar we keep to ourselves, save or spend on ourselves is directly removing resources from the hands of all women.The Exponential Youhttps://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/e...So, MGTOW's get a lot of hate. Why?http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/co...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy